Tuesday, June 21, 2011

U.S. hits Debt Ceiling on May 16, 2011

U.S. National Debt as at 21/06/2011:-





U.S. hits Debt Ceiling on May 16, 2011.  The difference between Greece Debt Crisis and recent U.S. Debt debate is, the Greece unable to pay the bills and the U.S. degress of willingness to meet its obligations.


What is Debt ceiling?
According to Sahadi (CNNMoney, 2011), debt ceiling is a cap set by Congress on the amount of debt the federal government can legally borrow. The cap applies to debt owed to the public (i.e., anyone who buys U.S. bonds) plus debt owed to federal government trust funds such as those for Social Security and Medicare.
What is the debt ceiling limit right now?
The Bureau of the Public Debt stated that the debt ceiling limit is set at $14.294 trillion now. However, the United States’ accrued debt hit that mark on May 16 this year.
How if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling before Aug 2?
U.S. treasury would not have authority to borrow any more money.  The alternative solutions to this situation are to raise the debt ceiling or to pay interest due to bondholders or to cut spending & raise tax. However, total income (government revenue minus government spending) is not enough pay interest to all of its bondholders. That means U.S. treasury will have to pick and choose who to pay and who to put off every day.  Potential default is still assist because U.S. won’t be able to pay all the country’s bills & meet its debt obligations if the lawmakers do not increase the debt limit.
The Standard & Poor’s is threatening U.S. by downgrade the credit outlook from “stable” to “negative” if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling limit by Aug 2.  Currently, The U.S Debt is rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s,  acknowledged as one of the safest investment in the world today. It is the reason why  the rest of the world willing to buy the U.S. securities for 14.3 Trillion.
If U.S. default, the consequences are so great and even greater than the 2008 financial crisis & 1997 Financial crisis. Personally, I don't think the U.S. will let it happen. However, the deadline is approaching and Congress yet to finalise the decision.  The tension is growing everywhere as the deadline is approaching.
Why the U.S. Treasury Bond is in high Demand?
The reason of the Triple A rating by S&P is mainly backed by the U.S Economy, still the largest in the world despite weak economic recovery, demands of US dollar in international market for trading purposes, the loose debt controlling policy, and the U.S. is still the world largest exporter in the world.
Why the Congress not just raise the Debt Ceiling?
The most recent time the debt ceiling was raised was in February 2010. In fact, debt ceiling was raised almost 10 times since 2001 & almost 100 times since 1940. The Congress is arguing on the alternatives whether to raise the debt ceiling again or to cut spending & raise taxes.
Some congress members urge to slow down the accumulation of debt by suggesting budget changes. They realized that if they raise the debt ceiling once again, the U.S economy will be a step further to the "black hole". 
Budget changes can be cut government spending, raise individual and corporate taxes, reduce military funding, cut social benefit funding, etc.. By doing so, the government can increase its net budget position and reduce the dependence on borrowing by selling securities. But why the congress always chosen to raise debt limit instead of budget changes in the past 10 years?
Don't forget, political dispute is one of the factor to this problem. How the Republican and Democratic party reflects to gain votes in the coming election? The congress decision in either ways will definitely affected the next election result.
What are the impacts if Congress chosen to cut spending or to raise tax?
The weakening U.S. economy can't affords the decision  either spending cut or tax raise. These actions will further bring down the pace of economy recovery in the U.S. or even turn the GDP figure into negative.

The U.S. federal spending mainly focus on medicare (23%), social security(20%) and defence department (20%). These 3 elements made up 63% of total spending. The Congress, either Republican or Democratic party, can't afford the consequences of cutting funding of medicare and social security. The U.S. people will not accept the reduce funding in these 2 areas. Moreover, the U.S. government also can't simply reduces the military funding, especially in this unstable world situation includes Libya political dispute, growing nuclear tension around the world and the military power in China.  In order to keep it world No.1 position in the world, the U.S. will need to continuously spend money in its military department.

If the government chosen to raise taxes, in economy theory, the individual disposable income will be lessen and people have lesser money to spend in the market. The corporate will have lesser money for investment. The GDP figure will be affected badly. If the U.S economy slow down, the rest of the world economies will follow its footstep because being the world largest consumer cutting its spending, means decreasing demands of goods & services in interntional market. In conclusion, if the purchasing power of American reduces, the world economy will be affected badly, espeially for countries rely much on trading with the American.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Best Performing Public Mutual Funds

Public Mutual Berhad is managing more than 80 funds today. However, which are the top performing funds can provide investors better returns in the medium and long term period? I have selected four P-series funds for further analysis, namely Public Smallcap Fund, Public Islamic Opportunities Fund, Public Bond Fund & Public Islamic Bond Fund.
 Total return of funds from March 2006 to March 2011 (Part 1)

 Total return of funds from March 2006 to March 2011 (Part 2)

1. Public SmallCap Fund
Public Smallcap Fund was the the best performing fund from March 2006 until March 2011. It managed to achieve 171.32% return within 4 years despite the economic downturn on mid 2008. The fund objective is to achieve high capital growth through investments in companies with small market capitalisation.

Public SmallCap Fund is categorized as Equity fund with Aggressive risk profile. Thus, the trend of this fund is much likely to follow Asian Stock Market performance. In other word, if KLCI falls, the tendency of this fund to fall is likely to be happen. However, this fund always outperformed its benchmark KLCI as explained by the following table & graph:-

Source: Fund Performance, Public Mutual Berhad (2011)

<><><><><><><><>
Annual returns for Financial Years Ended August 31
Year20062007200820092010
P SmallCap %11.4255.6-2.139.6635.15
Benchmark Index %4.8832.96-14.7510.0113.55
Source: Market review and outlook for April 2011, Public Mutual Berhad (2011).

The table above shows that Public Smallcap fund outperformed its benchmark,KLCI for 4 years with exceptional of year 2009, a slightly lower return than KLCI. In fact, P Smallcap managed to sustain it position with a slightly negative return of only 2.13% despite the heavily hit Global Financial Crisis in 2008 (KLCI dropped 14.75%).

As at April 2011, P Smallcap concentrated on Financial, Industrial and Communication sector, which these sectors are the driving force of economic gorwth, especially in Asian countries. Morningstar Rating gave a 5 stars to its overall performance. Moreover, Lipper Leaders gave scores of 5, 4 and 5 on Consistent Return, Preservation and Total Return respectively.


2. Public Islamic Opportunities Fund
Public Islamic Opportunities Fund ranked second in total 60 P-series Fund in term of total return from period of March 2006 to March 2011, recorded 115.91%. Objective of this fund is to achieve capital growth investments in companies with small market capitalisation which comply with Shariah Principles.

Public Islamic Opportunities Fund is categorized as Islamic Syariah Equity Fund with Aggressive Risk profile. Morningstar Rating gave it a 5 stars rating on its overall performance. Furthermore, Lipper Leaders gave scores of 4, 3 and 4 on Consistent Return, Preservation and Total Return respectively.

PIOF asset allocation concentrated on Malaysia market, mainly on Industrial, Consumer, Energy & Communication Sector



<><><><><><>
Source: Fund Performance, Public Mutual Berhad (2011)

Annual Returns for Financial Years Ended July 31
Year 20062007200820092010
PIOF %9.872.21-15.26.5924.47
Benchmark Index %2.6454.87-16.72-0.112.35
Source: Market review and outlook for April 2011, Public Mutual Berhad (2011).

The table above reported the annual returns of PIOF from period of 2006 to 2010. Again, this fund outperformed its benchmark index - FTSE Bursa Malaysia Emas Shariah Index for consecutive years. PIOF was affected by the 08' Financial Crisis too, recorded a negative return of 15.2% in that particular year. However, it managed to bounce back and gained a positive return of 6.59% & 24.47% in 2009 & 2010.

3. Public Bond Fund
Public Bond Fund (PBF) is categorized as MYR Bond fund with Conservative Risk profile. It managed to achieve 30.61% return within 4 years. Fund objective is to provide a steady stream of income returns through investment in money market and private debt securities.

Annual Returns for Financial Years Ended July 31
Year20062007200820092010
P Bond Fund %2.98.75-1.338.017.64
12-month FD %3.773.753.713.092.49
Source: Market review and outlook for April 2011, Public Mutual Berhad (2011).

Public Bond Fund is one of the best alternative for conservative investors & Fixed deposit investors. P Bond fund could provides investors with higher returns than FD rate in the medium to long term period. For investors who want to invest for medium term, PBF will be a good choice compared to FDR.

4.Public Islamic Bond Fund
PIBD is another best investment alternative  for conservative investors. This fund is categorized as Islamic Global bond with Conservative Risk Profile. Fund objective is to provide annual income to investors through investment in Islamic Debt Securities.

<><><><><><>
Annual Returns for Financial Years Ended Oct 31
Year20062007200820092010
PIBF %3.94.13.2710.077.75
12-month GIA %3.453.693.553.032.89
Source: Market review and outlook for April 2011, Public Mutual Berhad (2011).

PIBF was able to achieve positive returns for 5 consecutive years. Moreover, the annual return was much higher than the 12 month GIA rate or 12 month FDR rate. We only get 3% annual return if we invest in FDR today. Thus PIBF is much more attractive which also can provides you with sustainable return.

a. Investors are advised to diversify your investments into various alternatives (FDR, Stock market, Mutual Fund, etc) to achieve sustainable returns.
b. Investors should take note that there are fees and charges attached to these funds.